Time-sharing involves parents dividing time with their children when they divorce or separate. It is standard procedure in most Florida family law scenarios to give both parents a liberal amount of time-sharing and a degree of shared decision-making authority.
Judges want to make decisions that are in the best interests of the children in the family. They achieve that goal by helping maintain healthy parent-child relationships. Unfortunately, not all parents are equally capable of providing their children with a stable and safe home environment. In certain scenarios, judges may decide that it is best for children to spend the majority of their time with one parent.
What types of situations might lead to an imbalanced time-sharing arrangement in Florida?
A history of substance abuse
Few things impact parenting ability more negatively than addiction. Someone who drinks to the point of unconsciousness or who abuses prescription medication could very easily fail to meet the needs of their children.
Those with substance abuse disorders may put the acquisition and consumption of their preferred substance ahead of the needs of their children. They may become volatile and dangerous while under the influence.
They may also be unable to meet the children meet the basic needs of the children while under the influence. Evidence of an ongoing substance abuse disorder could convince the courts to limit one parent’s time with the children for their safety.
A pattern of domestic violence
Occasionally, one parent has been abusive toward the other or toward the children. Judges may limit the parental rights of someone who has intentionally injured their children before.
They may also consider the aggressive behavior of one parent witnessed by the children when allocating parental rights and responsibilities. Typically, a parent seeking custody concessions because of domestic violence means corroborating evidence such as medical records or police reports to validate their claims.
Truly unstable circumstances
Sometimes, a parent who could do right by their children is not currently in a position to do so. Maybe they slumped into a depression during the divorce and lost their job. Perhaps they do not currently have permanent living arrangements.
A parent dealing with instability related to their finances or housing may be incapable of co-parenting until their situation improves. Other unusual scenarios, including incarceration or extreme health challenges, can also potentially influence time-sharing decisions.
Parents who understand the factors that can even influence time-sharing decisions made by judges can gather the necessary evidence to protect their children. Limiting one adult’s time with the children is sometimes the best option if they cannot consistently act in the best interests of their kids.
Time-sharing involves parents dividing time with their children when they divorce or separate. It is standard procedure in most Florida family law scenarios to give both parents a liberal amount of time-sharing and a degree of shared decision-making authority.
Judges want to make decisions that are in the best interests of the children in the family. They achieve that goal by helping maintain healthy parent-child relationships. Unfortunately, not all parents are equally capable of providing their children with a stable and safe home environment. In certain scenarios, judges may decide that it is best for children to spend the majority of their time with one parent.
What types of situations might lead to an imbalanced time-sharing arrangement in Florida?
A history of substance abuse
Few things impact parenting ability more negatively than addiction. Someone who drinks to the point of unconsciousness or who abuses prescription medication could very easily fail to meet the needs of their children.
Those with substance abuse disorders may put the acquisition and consumption of their preferred substance ahead of the needs of their children. They may become volatile and dangerous while under the influence.
They may also be unable to meet the children meet the basic needs of the children while under the influence. Evidence of an ongoing substance abuse disorder could convince the courts to limit one parent’s time with the children for their safety.
A pattern of domestic violence
Occasionally, one parent has been abusive toward the other or toward the children. Judges may limit the parental rights of someone who has intentionally injured their children before.
They may also consider the aggressive behavior of one parent witnessed by the children when allocating parental rights and responsibilities. Typically, a parent seeking custody concessions because of domestic violence means corroborating evidence such as medical records or police reports to validate their claims.
Truly unstable circumstances
Sometimes, a parent who could do right by their children is not currently in a position to do so. Maybe they slumped into a depression during the divorce and lost their job. Perhaps they do not currently have permanent living arrangements.
A parent dealing with instability related to their finances or housing may be incapable of co-parenting until their situation improves. Other unusual scenarios, including incarceration or extreme health challenges, can also potentially influence time-sharing decisions.
Parents who understand the factors that can even influence time-sharing decisions made by judges can gather the necessary evidence to protect their children. Limiting one adult’s time with the children is sometimes the best option if they cannot consistently act in the best interests of their kids.